Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Science and Technology), Master of Law. Excellent intellectual property lawyer of Nanjing Bar Association. Deputy Director of the Patent Business Committee of Jiangsu Lawyers Association, Deputy Director of the Artificial Intelligence Legal Professional Committee of Nanjing Lawyers Association, External Teacher of the School of Intellectual Property of Nanjing University of Technology, Key Talent of Intellectual Property in Jiangsu Province, Leading Talent of Young Lawyers of Jiangsu Lawyers Association, Registered Lawyer in the Intellectual Property Lawyer Talent Pool of Jiangsu Lawyers Association, Registered Expert in the Intellectual Property Expert Pool of Changzhou City, and Intellectual Property Technical Investigator of Ma'anshan City. Previously worked at ZTE Corporation, familiar with enterprise intellectual property management system, with rich experience in intellectual property litigation and patent invalidation; And has rich experience in computer software copyright infringement litigation and other aspects; Proficient in patent application, patent layout, and patent search analysis; Three patents have been awarded as one of the 100 excellent invention patents in Jiangsu Province, and one patent has been awarded as one of the 50 excellent invention patents nationwide. We have also provided intellectual property analysis and evaluation services for multiple enterprises.

The (2021) Supreme People's Court case No. 1066 established the judgment rule that the scale of the infringer's external publicity business serves as the basis for calculating damages. Selected as the abstract of the Annual Report on Intellectual Property Cases of the Supreme People's Court (2022), awarded 20 typical cases of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People's Court in 2022, selected as the judgment essence of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People's Court, selected as 100 typical cases of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People's Court in 5 years, and selected as a case library of the People's Court. The People's Court Daily conducted a special report on this case.

The (2021) Su 01 Min Chu 3229 case, represented by Su 01, is the first case in China where the defendant's GPL open source defense has been supported by the court. It has been rated as one of the top ten typical cases of intellectual property protection in Jiangsu courts in 2022, one of the top ten typical cases of intellectual property protection in Nanjing courts in 2022, one of the typical cases of intellectual property protection in Nanjing Lawyers Association in 2022, and one of the typical cases of intellectual property protection in the National Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Committee in 2022. The judgment document of this case won the 6th National Court Hundred Excellent Judgment Documents Award and the Jiangsu Court Hundred Excellent Judgment Documents Special Award.

The (2021) Supreme People's Court case No. 1710, represented by the defendant, is the first router invention patent infringement case in China to be fully won by the defendant. The case involves the issue of infringement determination of multi-party implementation method patents. The invention patent in this case involves Portal authentication technology, and the patent applicant is Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., which was later transferred to Shenzhen Dunjun Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Dunjun Technology Co., Ltd. has initiated dozens of lawsuits nationwide, and all defendants have lost. Among them, one case was selected as a guiding case by the Supreme People's Court, and one case was selected as one of the top 50 typical intellectual property cases in China in 2020. In the case where both the guidance case and the typical case supported the original request, the reference application of the guidance case and the typical case was successfully denied, and a comprehensive victory was achieved.

In the case of (2022) Supreme Fazhixingzhong No. 594, the China National Intellectual Property Administration decided to maintain the validity of the patent right under the condition that all technical features, including the technical subject matter, constitute distinctive technical features compared with patent claim 1 and the closest existing technology. After the administrative proceedings, the decision of invalidation declaration was revoked by the first instance judgment, and the court of second instance upheld the first instance judgment. After the China National Intellectual Property Administration lost the lawsuit and re tried, the patent right was declared null and void.